Diesel Engines
Hybrid Systems
Parallel Propulsion
What we like about a Parallel propulsion:
1) While motoring with the electric motors they are very quiet and don't smell.
2) Anytime we are motoring off batteries we are not burning diesel. That is around 3 to 5 hours of silent motoring each day. In fact, on 90% of passages we won't burn any diesel fuel at all if we have electric propulsion.
3) We will have more range than a Diesel or even the Hybrid boat, because you can motor off electric when you have the battery power, then switch to the more economic diesels (versus a generator), which gets rid of some of the conversion losses. (See the fuel comparison below).
Combo Propulsion
What we like about a Combo propulsion system:
1) While motoring with the electric motors they are very quiet and don't smell.
2) Anytime we are motoring off batteries we are not burning diesel. That is around 2.6 to 4 hours of silent motoring each day (the range depends on if we are using our auxiliary battery as well). In fact, on 90% of passages we won't burn any diesel fuel at all if we have electric propulsion.
3) Our range is about the same as the Parallel system and we will have more range than a Diesel or Hybrid boat because we can motor off electric when we have the battery power then switch to the more economic diesel (versus a generator), which gets rid of some of the conversion losses. (See the fuel comparison below).
4) We will have more horsepower available than any of the other options because you may choose to power the boat from the diesel engine and electric motor, simultaneously. This is excellent in a situation where more power is needed for a short time.
5) This system weights less than all the others.
Since we are building a Solitaire 1500, we must add a new propulsion system, therefore, we could go with two parallel diesel/electric engine/motors (see right).
The Beta 43 engines are 43hp each and come with 10kw electric motors. The advantage of this system is that it costs a combined $2,896 less than the Yanmar 4JH45 and is 34 pounds lighter. However, it has a combined 4 hp less power.
Stats Per Hull
Configuration - 4-stroke, vertical, water-cooled diesel
Max. output: 43 hp
Displacement - 2.197 ltr
Cylinders - 4 in-line
Dry weight without gear - 287 kg / 633 lbs.
Price: $26,263 x 2
The Yanmar 4JH45 engines are 45hp each and come with 10kw electric motors. The advantage of this system is that the engines offer a combined 4 hp more power. The disadvantage is that they cost a combined $2,986 more and are 34 pounds heavier. Still, for the extra horsepower, at this point, we are leaning toward the Yanmar parallel engines.
Stats Per Hull
Configuration - 4-stroke, vertical, water-cooled diesel
Max. output - 45 hp
Displacement - 2.19 ltr (134 cu in)
Cylinders - 4 in-line
Dry Weight - 295 kg / 650 lbs
Price: $28,450 x 2
Once again, because we are building a semi-custom Solitaire 1500, we will need to add a new propulsion system. Our other choice is to go with one parallel diesel/electric engine/motor plus one 20 kw electric motor in the other hull (see diagram, right).
This Combo setup uses a Yanmar 110hp Diesel engine with a 20 kw electric motor in parallel, meaning they use the same drive shaft for propulsion. This will be in one hull while a 20kw electric motor is in the opposite hull. We will store the batteries and dive compressor in the same hulls as the electric motor to offset the weight of the parallel diesel in the opposite hull.
The advantage of this system over the Parallel are less cost, less weight, less fuel usage, less maintenance, and less money to install, yet it offers more horse power!
As for fuel mileage, the 110 hp diesel is about the same as the 45 hp of the parallel or 50 hp of the diesel only system when we are running one diesel engine at the same horsepower for cruising speed. By comparing the power output vs rpm, and then how much fuel these engines burn a that rpm, if any of the diesels are pushing the boat at the same horsepower, the different size engines use nearly the same gallons per hour. The only additional fuel loss comes when we engage the 20kw motor as a generator since that will put an extra load on the engine.
Stats Per Hull #1
Configuration - 4-stroke, vertical, water-cooled diesel
Max. output - 110 hp
Displacement - 2. Liters (122 cu. in.)
Cylinders - 4 in-line
20 kw electric motor
Max. output - 29 hp
Dry Weight - 389 kg / 858 pounds
Stats Per Hull #2
Configuration - 20 kw electric motor
Voltage: 48v
Max. output - equivalent of 29 hp
Dry Weight - 77 kg / 135 lbs
Batteries: 299 kg / 660 lbs
It is pretty simple, the Combo boat beats the Hybrid's best case scenario by 367 pounds, worst by 936.8 pounds. It beats the Parallel by 307 pounds. And it beats the Diesel boat by 578 pounds.
The clear winner is the Combo system as the lightest option and remember, keeping the weight down is absolutely critical on a performance catamaran!
When we compared all four of the propulsion types, using different length passages in different situations. We discovered that the Combo propulsion system is the obvious winner. This is simply because it has all the advantages of each system. It can function as a diesel boat, a hybrid boat, or a parallel boat, using whichever is the most fuel saving system at that moment. In fact, it pretty much ties or wins in every scenario we tested.
If you want a detailed look at everything we used in our comparisons as well as the results for each different passage calculated for each of the four propulsion systems, use the button below to view the Fuel Comparison Data.
Or, just accept that the Combo system wins in fuel efficiency!
Initial Cost to add Diesel Engines
Initial Cost to add Hybrid system
Initial Cost to add a Parallel system
Initial Cost to add a Combo Parallel & Electric system
After calculating all our passages on our double circumnavigation, based on a gallon of diesel costing $5.00 we come up with some fuel savings for the Hybrid, Parallel, and Combo propulsion systems over the Diesel boat. There are also some maintenance savings. However, the initial cost of the diesel installation is less.
That means, figuring in fuel and maintenance costs plus the initial purchase prices of the these four systems, the long term prices shake out like this:
1) Diesel: Purchase $46,200 Fuel used: $24,080. Maintenance: $14,000 Total: $84,280.
2) Hybrid: Purchase $106,356. Fuel used: $35,236. Maintenance: 1,000. Total: $142,592.
3) Parallel : Purchase $78,100. Fuel used: $21,306. Maintenance: $4,000. Total: $103,406.
4) Combo: Purchase $72,402. Fuel used: $12,766. Maintenance Total: $3,125. Total: $88,293.
As you can see, in the long run, the Diesel boat still comes out the cheapest, but only by around $4,000 over the Combo boat. For that small amount of money, we get the peace of mind of endless electric 'fuel' so that we will never run out on a passage. We get rid of propane on board, and gas for the tender, making the boat safer.
The Diesel boat also requires more gallons of fuel, which means, we must find, buy, and occasionally transport and then pour this fuel from Jerry cans. During our long voyage twice around planet Earth, we get to use 2,262 gallons less diesel fuel with the Combo setup over the Diesel boat. That is a lot of Jerry Cans! We also spend about 6,000 hours less time smelling and hearing the diesel engine running with the Combo boat.
Finally, our catamaran weighs less the entire time by hundreds of pounds and has a redundant propulsion system if the diesel has an issue!
Therefore, in the long run, though the Diesel saves us $4,000 over the Combo, all the numerous extra benefits Combo propulsion are just too good to pass up.
As for the $4,000 extra, this is all assuming that the price of diesel does not go up during those 13 years we plan to sail! Most likely, it will. If the price does increase... even by a couple of dollars a gallon, here are the recalculated numbers:
1) Diesel: Purchase $46,200 Fuel used: $33,713 Maintenance: $14,000 Total: $92,913.
2) Hybrid: Purchase $106,356. Fuel used: $49,330. Maintenance: 1,000. Total: $156,686.
3) Parallel : Purchase $78,100. Fuel used: $29,829. Maintenance: $4,000. Total: $110,929.
4) Combo: Purchase $72,402. Fuel used: $17,873. Maintenance Total: $3,125. Total: $93,400.
As you can see, now the Combo is about equal in long term coast to the diesel only boat, yet you still have all the benefits of the electric portion of the system.
Now, if your overall voyage is much shorter, the diesel system will save you money over any of the other system, including the Combo, simply because it is far cheaper to install initially. So, if you are not going around the planet, it might cost you more to get the benefits of the Combo propulsion system.
However, we are planning to go around the planet, twice! Therefore, there is no question which is the best option for S/V Lynx; the Combo propulsion system wins the cost battle due to the small difference between it and the diesel, coupled with all the benefits you gain with a hybrid boat.
As you can see, the Hybrid boat is woefully underpowered in comparison to the other three options. Horsepower is the category that eliminates the Hybrid from our consideration since that system does not have enough power to motor us out of a dire situation or get us up current while motoring on swiftly flowing river.
The Parallel system beats the Diesel with 6 additional horsepower.
The Combo beats the Diesel by 29 horsepower. So, of the three other systems, the Combo system boat has the most horsepower.
The winner, obviously, the Combo system boat.
Safety Consideration:
Both the Diesel and Hybrid boat are not as safe as the Parallel or Combo boats as they are the only two offering both the total elimination of explosive fuels. They both have the needed horsepower for certain situations. And, they both have two propulsion systems.
The Combo system ties or wins in nearly every category we have listed: better fuel economy, more horsepower, less weight, and added safety. It only looses to the Diesel in overall cost, and only by a small amount. And, like the Hybrid and Parallel system boats, the Combo boat offers us all the comforts of electric propulsion and far less times than any of the other systems where we must obtain diesel fuel.
The reason it beats the others is simple. The Combo a can be a diesel boat, a hybrid boat, or a parallel boat, depending on which is best at that moment.
Therefore, the Combo propulsion system is our winner, by a long shot. The initially cost to install is steep at $72,402, which is $26,202 more than buying the diesels and a generator.
However, that extra initial cost is paid back in fuel, propane, and maintenance savings over the thirteen year voyage, assuming diesel prices slowly rising.
That means, in the long run, using the Combo system only costs us a maximum of $4,000 more than a Diesel system, and may cost about the same depending on diesel prices in the future. Then, it gives us a whole lot of added comfort and safety during the entire circumnavigation of planet Earth.
That is why we decided that to go with with a Combo Hybrid Parallel Diesel system.
Standard propellers have fixed blades, meaning, whether they are in use or not, they blades are still extended.
Feathering props turn the blades. That way, when not in use they can be turned sideways to the flow of water.
Reversing props fold down and then reverse the blade so that the leading edge is always used in forward or reverse.
Brunston's Eco*Star Reversing propeller
The Eco*Star is known for its regenerative capabilities. Since we have two electric motors, both using regeneration, this is critical. But that is not the only reason we went with this choice in props. Since we have one Parallel Diesel engine/electric motor, and the diesel engine needs to run at a faster RPM while the electric motor will run at a slower RPM, we needed a prop that would automatically adjust the pitch based on the RPM so that both engine and motor using the same prop are efficient when powering the boat. The Eco*Star is that prop.
Created with Mobirise
Free Offline Website Builder